apelin receptor antagonist ml221 (TargetMol)
Structured Review

Apelin Receptor Antagonist Ml221, supplied by TargetMol, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 2 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/apelin receptor antagonist ml221/product/TargetMol
Average 91 stars, based on 2 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Exercise ameliorates osteopenia in mice via intestinal microbial-mediated bile acid metabolism pathway"
Article Title: Exercise ameliorates osteopenia in mice via intestinal microbial-mediated bile acid metabolism pathway
Journal: Theranostics
doi: 10.7150/thno.104186
Figure Legend Snippet: FMT from exercised mice activated apelin signaling pathway. (A) PCA plot of samples from TranspCtrl and TranspExer groups (n = 3 per group). (B) Volcano plot of DEGs. (C) Enrichment analysis of upregulated DEGs in the TranspExer group. (D) Heatmap of expression levels of genes associated with the apelin signaling pathway. (E) Relative mRNA expression levels of Apln , Aplnr , Adcy4 , and Adcy5 . (F) Serum apelin concentration. (G) Representative apelin-stained IHC sections. (H) Relative mRNA expression levels of Pparg , Cebpa , Fabp4 , and Lpl . (I) Representative H&E sections depicting adipose tissue. (J-K) Quantitative analysis of J) number of adipocytes and K) adipocytes area. (L) Representative µCT images of tibias in TranspCtrl and TranspExer mice treated with AAV-Ctrl or AAV-Apln. (M-N) Trabecular bone microarchitecture showing BMD and Tb. N. Graphs show mean ± SEM (n = 6 per group), with statistical significance determined by two-tailed student t test in E-F, H, and J-K, and one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test in M-N. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Concentration Assay, Staining, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: Exercise-matched FMT reshaped the gut metabolite profiles in OVX mice. (A) PCA plot. (B) Volcano plot of differential metabolites. (C) Enrichment analysis of upregulated metabolites in the TranspExer group. (D) Heatmap of differential metabolites between the TranspCtrl and TranspExer groups. (E) Flowchart of the gavage procedure for key metabolites in OVX mice. (F) Representative µCT images of tibias from mice in Sham, Ctrl, Tau, and UDCA groups. (G) Representative H&E-stained, OCN-stained, and TRAP-stained sections. Black arrows indicating osteoclasts. (H-I) Quantitative results of N. OBs/BS and N. OCs/BS. (J) Relative RNA expression levels of genes Apln and Aplnr . Graphs show mean ± SEM (n = 6 per group), with statistical significance determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Techniques Used: Staining, RNA Expression
Figure Legend Snippet: Exercise-matched FMT and key metabolites ameliorated age-related bone loss. (A) Flowchart of FMT administration in aged mice. (B) Representative µCT images of tibias from aged mice in the TranspCtrl group and the TranspExer group. (C-E) Trabecular bone microarchitecture showing C) BMD, D) BV/TV, and E) Tb. N. (F) Ct. Th statistical results. (G-H) Biomechanical results of G) yield point and H) ultimate force. (I) Representative H&E-stained, OCN-stained, and TRAP-stained sections from the TranspCtrl group and the TranspExer group. Black arrows indicating osteoclasts. (J) Quantitative results of N. OBs/BS. (K) Relative mRNA expression levels of genes Apln and Aplnr . (L) Flowchart of metabolites supplementation in aged mice. (M) Representative µCT images of tibias from aged mice in the AgeCtrl, AgeTau, and AgeUDCA groups. (N-P) Trabecular bone microarchitecture showing N) BMD, O) BV/TV, and P) Tb. N. (Q) Representative H&E-stained, OCN-stained, and TRAP-stained sections from the AgeCtrl, AgeTau, and AgeUDCA groups. Black arrows indicating osteoclasts. (R) Quantitative results of N. OBs/BS. (S) Relative mRNA expression levels of genes Apln and Aplnr . Graphs show mean ± SEM (n = 6 per group), with statistical significance determined by two-tailed student t test in C-H and J-K, and one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test in N-S. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Techniques Used: Staining, Expressing, Two Tailed Test
